Chlorine factories a mercury mess?

This is serious!!!!!!

I am sure as a Businessmen , they ought to think about their social responsibility about people. Just imagine, if all their customer died of mercury poisoning. Then, their business have no customer's. What is the end result??

When I visit My parents home town in China again during the early 90's, I was sad to knew that the family Drinking well have to shut down after my 1st ancestor set up the 1st drinking water well in this island. The Well history is over 2,000 years. This Drinking water well actually served for the township with 5,000 population. I am told by the official that the well shut down due to Mercury poisoning.

Therefore, the coast of the that island is also affected as well. The fishes that along the straight opposite Taiwan may also contaminated. So you can imagine, if the action were not taken, the island total population of 600,000 may all be affect by mercury.

So, be it in China..Europe or USA..there must be a high standard & enforcement on contamination to our drinking water.

Chlorine factories a mercury mess?
Activists, industry spar over toxic metal emissions
The Associated Press Updated: 3:33 p.m. ET Jan. 26, 2005

WASHINGTON - Environmentalists on Wednesday released a report claiming that the nine factories in the United States still making chlorine with mercury are emitting dangerous amounts of the toxic metal. The industry acknowledged that tons of mercury are unaccounted for each year, but did not believe that the mercury is being dumped into the air or water.

Chlorine at such plants is made by pumping electrically charged salty water through a vat of mercury, a process devised more than 100 years ago. Environmentalists say these plants are a largely ignored and unchecked source of mercury pollution.

Mercury settles in waterways and accumulates in fish. In humans who eat those fish, the metal can cause neurological and developmental problems, particularly in fetuses and children.

Citing chlorine factories as a “major global source of mercury,” the Washington, D.C.-based environmental group Oceana called on the Environmental Protection Agency to require all the plants to convert to mercury-free technology by 2008.

“Fifteen years ago, Congress amended the Clean Air Act, which requires companies like these to continually improve to cut down releases of hazardous chemicals like mercury,” Andrew Sharpless, Oceana’s chief executive officer, said at a news conference. “But rather than enforce this law, the EPA is still giving these chlorine plants a pass and letting them continue to release tons of mercury every year with their 19th century technology.”

Industry's response
Arthur Duncan, vice president of safety and health for The Chlorine Institute, a trade group based in Arlington, Va., said emissions have been significantly reduced in the past decade.

“Certainly mercury has been a concern for a long time to people and it’s an environmental issue that we’re working to address,” he said.

The calculations of how much mercury is dispersed into the environment are in dispute. The industry, in reports to the EPA, says eight tons — about three 50-gallon barrels — were emitted in 2003.

For example, the companies said a plant in Muscle Shoals, Ala., emitted 1,757 pounds of mercury that year; another, in New Castle, Del., released 2,863 pounds.

But the environmentalists say these calculations may be wrong, because while the companies monitor the amount of mercury that goes out of their smokestacks, they merely estimate the amount that evaporates and leaves the factories through vents.

In addition, industry officials acknowledge that they cannot account for an additional 30 tons a year. They say that it could be stuck in factory pipes, and they are trying to find it.

The environmentalists are skeptical. They think even more mercury is missing, pointing out that more mercury is delivered to the plants each year than is going out — 65 tons more in 2000 alone, said Oceana’s Jacqueline Savitz, co-author of the report.

But industry officials say that mercury purchases do not necessarily equal mercury use, because some of it is simply stored to be used later.

EPA spokeswoman Cynthia Bergman said the question of where all this mercury went is very important to her agency, but that the EPA’s “best information indicates that the mercury is not being emitted into the air.”

Curbs on power plants
While total mercury emissions in the United States have fallen substantially since 1990, power plants remain the largest remaining human-caused source. They released 90,370 pounds of mercury into the air in 2002, the most recent year for which EPA data are available.

Federal guidelines released last February place strict limits on the amount of mercury that power plants can release.

They place no similar caps on chlorine plants, but do require more frequent emission measurements and equipment inspections, “significantly more stringent requirements” than had been in force before, said Vito Fiore, a vice president of Vulcan Chemicals, which has a plant in Port Edwards, Wis.
MSNBC - Chlorine factories a mercury mess?